There's your problem! You hipsters and PBR! Should have used Bud or Miller like the rest of us.ssorck wrote:I soak labels off in PBR for a few days.
Gusher infection? Or something else?
Moderators: BlackDuck, Beer-lord, LouieMacGoo, philm00x, gwcr
Re: Gusher infection? Or something else?
In Soviet Russia, beer brews you!
My brews
- teutonic terror
- Brew Master
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:16 pm
- Location: Virginia
Re: Gusher infection? Or something else?
Now, I'm gonna ask a question.
Could it be an excess of priming sugar in connection with the chocolate malt?
Meaning, is there something about dark malt that reacts with sugar, even at accepted priming levels?
It seems there are alot of folks having a problem with gushers and chocolate malt, could reducing the amount of sugar solve the problem?
Could it be an excess of priming sugar in connection with the chocolate malt?
Meaning, is there something about dark malt that reacts with sugar, even at accepted priming levels?
It seems there are alot of folks having a problem with gushers and chocolate malt, could reducing the amount of sugar solve the problem?
Re: Gusher infection? Or something else?
There theoretically should not be anything special about chocolate malt. The only logical explanation would be that small bits of the chocolate malt break off in the mash/steep and end up in the wort and somehow stay in suspension instead of settling into the trub - and then end up in the bottles and form nucleation points for the CO2. That could be something specific to a certain kind of chocolate malt from one manufacturer - I've never had this happen with what I buy, which is a darker imported British chocolate malt.
Your boiling the wort after the steep/mash so bugs in the grain don't matter. It's not going to create extra sugar/fermentables in the bottle magically.
Although I guess carbing it lower by using less sugar would still help in that case since there would be less CO2 to get all reactive on you.
Your boiling the wort after the steep/mash so bugs in the grain don't matter. It's not going to create extra sugar/fermentables in the bottle magically.
Although I guess carbing it lower by using less sugar would still help in that case since there would be less CO2 to get all reactive on you.
Re: Gusher infection? Or something else?
russki wrote:There's your problem! You hipsters and PBR! Should have used Bud or Miller like the rest of us.ssorck wrote:I soak labels off in PBR for a few days.
Typing after drinking, lol!
Re: Gusher infection? Or something else?
Shame on you!!ssorck wrote:russki wrote:There's your problem! You hipsters and PBR! Should have used Bud or Miller like the rest of us.ssorck wrote:I soak labels off in PBR for a few days.
Typing after drinking, lol!
Yu kno we dun't do dat on this formru.
Sibling Brewers
- FedoraDave
- FedoraDave
- Posts: 4208
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:52 pm
- Location: North and west of the city
- Contact:
Re: Gusher infection? Or something else?
I tend to think not. One of my gusher batches was a stout, so I didn't use a whole lot of priming sugar at all, in compliance with the style.teutonic terror wrote:Now, I'm gonna ask a question.
Could it be an excess of priming sugar in connection with the chocolate malt?
Meaning, is there something about dark malt that reacts with sugar, even at accepted priming levels?
I wish Roger could find that link to the article on grain harvested when wet. That made a lot of sense to me, and it's the theory I'm going to stick with. Unfortunately, there's no way to know the harvesting conditions of any grain one buys.
Obey The Hat!
http://www.homebrew-with-the-hat.com
Some regard me as a Sensei of Brewing
http://www.homebrew-with-the-hat.com
Some regard me as a Sensei of Brewing
Fedora Brauhaus
- jimjohson
- Brewer of the Month
- Posts: 2603
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:14 pm
- Location: Cusseta Ga
- Contact:
Re: Gusher infection? Or something else?
FedoraDave wrote:I tend to think not. One of my gusher batches was a stout, so I didn't use a whole lot of priming sugar at all, in compliance with the style.teutonic terror wrote:Now, I'm gonna ask a question.
Could it be an excess of priming sugar in connection with the chocolate malt?
Meaning, is there something about dark malt that reacts with sugar, even at accepted priming levels?
I wish Roger could find that link to the article on grain harvested when wet. That made a lot of sense to me, and it's the theory I'm going to stick with. Unfortunately, there's no way to know the harvesting conditions of any grain one buys.
really? harvesting conditions? how are you suopst to know?
"Filled with mingled cream and amber
I will drain that glass again.
Such hilarious visions clamber
Through the chambers of my brain
-- Quaintest thoughts -- Queerest fancies
Come to life and fade away;
Who cares how time advances?
I am drinking ale today."
Edgar Allan Poe
I will drain that glass again.
Such hilarious visions clamber
Through the chambers of my brain
-- Quaintest thoughts -- Queerest fancies
Come to life and fade away;
Who cares how time advances?
I am drinking ale today."
Edgar Allan Poe