Shame on Bell's

Vent, Rant, Chat or just talk about whatever is on your mind! Keep it civil though!

Moderators: BlackDuck, Beer-lord, LouieMacGoo, philm00x, gwcr

User avatar
DaYooper
Braumeister
Braumeister
Posts: 919
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 11:09 am
Location: Motownish, Michigan

Re: Shame on Bell's

Post by DaYooper »

Will have to see how much "fight" goes into this. Many companies will just challenge and not put much weight behind it so in the future if they need to they have paper evidence that they made a stand should the other company come back at them down the road and claim title.

It is going to get worse before it gets better. In the past there were so few beers, and even early in the craft realm there were more regulars than rotators. Now, the craze is trying the Next Best Thing so breweries are pushed to constantly come out with new brews. Eventually everyone is going to infringe on everyone to the point that we start drinking beers named "IPA #162."
Silverleaf Vineyard & Winery / Old Mission Hops Exchange / Porchside Vineyard / The North York Brewing Company
User avatar
Rebel_B
Braumeister
Braumeister
Posts: 968
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Seatac, WA

Re: Shame on Bell's

Post by Rebel_B »

Just left my local Homebrew monthly club meeting... Had an interesting guest speaker, Dave Navarro. Founder & head brewer at Pacific Brewing & Malting Co. Just opened up in 2014. He was answering a lot of questions from club members & brought some growlers to sample.
He related the story of reviving the Pacific Brewing name (a Tacoma brewer that went out of business during Prohibition). He hired a $405/hour trademark & patent lawyer. They did the research, the Pacific Brewing label had not been used for some 60 years. So they 'trademarked it'. On the last day of the 30 day comment/challenge period, Grupo Modelo (brewer of Pacifico beer, owned by A-B InBev) challenged the name.
Dave was determined to bring back the Pacific Brewing name to his hometown Tacoma, WA. He didn't back down, he spent a bunch of $, enlisted the support of a craft brewer's network. When it was all said & done, he won. He did agree not to sell any lager named Pacific. They sell a lager called 1897 Lager, based on the original Pacific Brewing bestseller. It is an all-malt lager, so it is a little bit different than the original recipe.

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1426911939.965027.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1426911939.965027.jpg (243.35 KiB) Viewed 611 times
Drinking: Columbus Double India Pale Ale
Bottled/Conditioning: Trippel
Fermenting: Columbus Double India Pale Ale, Trippel
User avatar
FedoraDave
FedoraDave
FedoraDave
Posts: 4208
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:52 pm
Location: North and west of the city
Contact:

Re: Shame on Bell's

Post by FedoraDave »

Best of luck to Pacific Brewing & Malting. I love stories about guys who revive a traditional business name that has a solid history in a certain area.
Obey The Hat!

http://www.homebrew-with-the-hat.com

Some regard me as a Sensei of Brewing
Fedora Brauhaus
Up Next:
FedoraDave's American Ale
Fermenting/Conditioning
Natural 20 Pale Ale -- Bull Terrier Best Bitter -- King Duncan's Porter -- Schöenwald Schwarzbier -- Littlejohn's Ale
Drinking:
Crown Top Pale Ale
Post Reply