I suspect that's a typo and you meant 1.013 and 1.017, not 1.103 and 1.107.Beer-lord wrote:Just checked the gravity on these 2 and the 001 came in right where the recipe said it should 1.103 and the 007, which does not attenuate as well, at 1.107. I'm thinking I may just dry hop tomorrow and cold crash Friday and keg Sunday or Monday and that way, these will be ready when I get back. Yeah I know, 14 days is fast but if done, its done.
That means the 001 is 75% attenuated and the 007 is 70% and White Labs shows 75-80% for 001 and 70-80% for 007. I usually get crappy attenuation when using 007 so these numbers aren't bad. The rest of the yeast should clean up while it's dry hopping and yes, I know I'm impatient but is that bad if I admit it?
A Tale of Two Frankenpales
Moderators: BlackDuck, Beer-lord, LouieMacGoo, philm00x, gwcr
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
You know me...I'm in the camp of "when it's done, it's done". My Levitation would have been kegged by day 8 or 9 if I would have had the time. As it stands, it was 13 days.Beer-lord wrote:Yeah I know, 14 days is fast but if done, its done.
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
Yeah, thanks for that. My bad....my very bad!bpgreen wrote:I suspect that's a typo and you meant 1.013 and 1.017, not 1.103 and 1.107.Beer-lord wrote:Just checked the gravity on these 2 and the 001 came in right where the recipe said it should 1.103 and the 007, which does not attenuate as well, at 1.107. I'm thinking I may just dry hop tomorrow and cold crash Friday and keg Sunday or Monday and that way, these will be ready when I get back. Yeah I know, 14 days is fast but if done, its done.
That means the 001 is 75% attenuated and the 007 is 70% and White Labs shows 75-80% for 001 and 70-80% for 007. I usually get crappy attenuation when using 007 so these numbers aren't bad. The rest of the yeast should clean up while it's dry hopping and yes, I know I'm impatient but is that bad if I admit it?
PABs Brewing
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
Not bad, just dyslexic as well as funny.
Making beer and stew for the Zombie Apocalypse.
Never mind, there it is.
Never mind, there it is.
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
I wish I could claim dyslexia but it's just poor typing and proof reading. I suck at many things and am a master of things to suck at.
PABs Brewing
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
So I dry hopped these tonite and here's what I did using some stuff I had laying around whilst trying to keep things close to the recipe.
On the 001 beer I used .5 oz of Mosaic, .5 of Palisade, 1 oz of Galaxy and 1 oz of El Dorado.
On the 007 beer I used 1.5 oz Chinook, 1.3 of Crystal (all that was left of what I had) and .75 of Mosaic.
I'm not the biggest Mosaic fan though it does pair well with some other hops.
The more I look at this recipe, the more its really just a baby IPA.
On the 001 beer I used .5 oz of Mosaic, .5 of Palisade, 1 oz of Galaxy and 1 oz of El Dorado.
On the 007 beer I used 1.5 oz Chinook, 1.3 of Crystal (all that was left of what I had) and .75 of Mosaic.
I'm not the biggest Mosaic fan though it does pair well with some other hops.
The more I look at this recipe, the more its really just a baby IPA.
PABs Brewing
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
Beer-lord wrote: I'm not the biggest Mosaic fan though it does pair well with some other hops.
You'd hate my latest APA then. It's 100% Mosaic and bursting with Mosaic flavor.
Bottling Volume: 3.50 gal
Estimated OG: 1.057 SG
Ingredients:
------------
Amt Name Type # %/IBU
3 lbs Pale Malt (2 Row) US (2.0 SRM) Grain 3 40.0 %
3 lbs Pale Malt, Maris Otter (3.0 SRM) Grain 4 40.0 %
1 lbs 8.0 oz Munich Malt (9.0 SRM) Grain 5 20.0 %
0.70 oz Mosaic [12.70 %] - Boil 60.0 min Hop 6 51.1 IBUs
0.35 oz Mosaic [12.70 %] - Boil 20.0 min Hop 7 15.5 IBUs
1.00 Items Servomyces (Boil 10.0 mins) Other 8 -
0.50 Items Whirlfloc Tablet (Boil 5.0 mins) Fining 9 -
1.50 oz Mosaic [12.70 %] - Steep/Whirlpool 30.0 Hop 10 42.1 IBUs
1.0 pkg Pacman strain (Wyeast 1764 #) Yeast 11 -
0.50 oz Mosaic [12.70 %] - Dry Hop 5.0 Days Hop 12 0.0 IBUs
Kind of like a Mosaic facial...
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
I don't know how long it's been since I've used Mosaic. Once Netscape hired pretty much all of the dev team, it kind of stagnated.Beer-lord wrote:I'm not the biggest Mosaic fan
Sorry, wrong Mosaic.
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
I'm not sure what Mosaic was but I remember Navigator!
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
And I'm back from the days of Telnet and MUDs and MOOs and MUSHes and Gopher. And command line FTP.
Mosiac, that was shiny fancy s*$%!
Mosiac, that was shiny fancy s*$%!
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
Can you say: "baud rate"?
LOL!
LOL!
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
I believe it was 1200/2400 at that time.BigPapaG wrote:Can you say: "baud rate"?
LOL!
Maybe I need to brew some 8bit IPA.
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
In the early days, they actually called it Netscape Mosaic.Kealia wrote:I'm not sure what Mosaic was but I remember Navigator!
GET OFF MY LAWN!
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
Technically, when it got that high, it was bits per second (which is close to baud, but not quite the same).mashani wrote:I believe it was 1200/2400 at that time.BigPapaG wrote:Can you say: "baud rate"?
LOL!
Maybe I need to brew some 8bit IPA.
Re: A Tale of Two Frankenpales
I STILL do command line ftp. Actually, I'm now more likely to use scp.mashani wrote:And I'm back from the days of Telnet and MUDs and MOOs and MUSHes and Gopher. And command line FTP.
Mosiac, that was shiny fancy s*$%!
I used gopher, archie and veronica.
Maybe we should start a separate thread for the internet reminiscing.