Secondary Fermemtation

Yes BrewDemon and Mr. Beer kits are pretty darn easy but sometime you need a little help from the Borg to get you on the right track. Post your questions here!

Moderators: BlackDuck, Beer-lord, LouieMacGoo, philm00x, gwcr

Post Reply
User avatar
ebbz
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:56 am
Location: The Great White Mid-Atlantic

Secondary Fermemtation

Post by ebbz »

I have been contemplating splitting my fermentation, for some batches, and had a question about smaller ones. I have read much about leaving as little headroom in the secondary. Given a two gallon batch would it be better rack to a three gallon carboy or 2 one gallon jugs?
LLAP

-In Cervesia Veritas
User avatar
mashani
mashani
mashani
Posts: 6743
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:57 pm

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by mashani »

If your going to do it you do want as little headspace as possible, so in your case the 2 jugs.

That said, I would not bother with doing it. I brew 1.08+ OG beers sometimes without bothering with a secondary. Back in the dark ages, I used to secondary all the time. No more, I consider it just one more step for something to go wrong with no real benefit IMHO as long as you are pitching enough yeast and/or can be patient and resist temptation and let stuff sit in the bottle if it needs to. But if you pitch enough yeast, even that becomes not as necessary.

IMHO the only real reason to do it would be to free up a fermenter faster if you just can't leave stuff in it for 2-3 weeks. Otherwise don't bother.

And my answer to that is to get more fermenters instead.
User avatar
RickBeer
Brew Guru
Brew Guru
Posts: 3099
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:21 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan (Go Blue!)

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by RickBeer »

Right. Never done a secondary in 4 1/2 years.
I have over 9,000 posts on "another forum", which means absolutely nothing. Mr. Beer January 2014 Brewer of the Month with all the pomp and circumstance that comes with it...

Certificate in Brewing and Distillation Technology

Sites to find beer making supplies: Adventures in Homebrewing - Mr. Beer - MoreBeer
My Beer - click to reveal
Currently using 6 LBKs.

Beers I regularly brew:
Bell's Best Brown clone
Irish Hills Red - I call this "Ann Arbor Red"
Mackinac Island Red - I call this "Michigan Red"
Oatmeal Stout - I call this Not Fat, Stout - Oatmeal Stout

Bottled 5 gallons of Ann Arbor Red on 4/18/17. Bottled 5 gallons of Michigan Red on 5/8/17.

Brewed in 2017 - 22.13 gallons (19.91 in 2012, 48.06 in 2013, 61.39 in 2014, 84.26 in 2015,46.39 in 2016)
Brewed in lifetime - 282.14 gallons
Drinkable beer on hand -  13.58 cases, with 6.11 cases ready in May and early June.
Average cost per 12 pack through all beer brewed - $6.27(ingredients only)
User avatar
LouieMacGoo
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1846
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 12:09 pm
Location: S.E. Michigan
Contact:

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by LouieMacGoo »

ebbz wrote:I have been contemplating splitting my fermentation, for some batches, and had a question about smaller ones. I have read much about leaving as little headroom in the secondary. Given a two gallon batch would it be better rack to a three gallon carboy or 2 one gallon jugs?

If you're doing 2 gal batches what are you looking to do or gain by splitting the batch into secondary? The only time I use a secondary is if I have a a big beer that has a high OG (1.075 or higher) or if I plan to do dry hopping of some type that works better by racking the wort on to the hops or whatever addition I have such as vanilla beans. In most cases with the smaller batches that we do as homebrewers moving the wort to secondary really isn't needed and could potentially cause problems with contamination or oxidizing the wort when racking it to the secondary.
Worrying can spoil the taste of beer more then anything else! ~ Charles Papazian

Find out more about Yeast, Hops, Grains and Cleaning & Sanitizing
Whats Brewing

Fermenting:

#40 - Citra-Nilla Cream Ale IPA - Brewed:9/20/15

Conditioning:
#39 - Dead Fly IPA - Brewed: 8/29/15 Bottled: 9/27/15
#38 - Apricot Hefeweizen (Colab w/Adam at SOL)- Brewed: 8/8/15

Drinking
#36 - Summer Wheat: Oberon Clone - Brewed: 7/11/15
#37 - Hickory Bourbon Honey Porter - Brewed: 7/18/15
#33 - Younger No. 1 Scottish Strong Ale - Brewed: 3/29/15
#28 - Hard Mulled Cider, Brewed 10/11/14 Kegged
#29 - Strawberry Lime Cider, Brewed/10/19/14 Kegged

Gone
#34 - Second Runnings IPA - Brewed: 3/29/15
#32 - Harvest Nugget Smash v2 (TBD) Brewed 11/27/14
#35 - Columbus Pale Ale - Brewed: 5/02/15
User avatar
Kealia
Brew Guru
Brew Guru
Posts: 5588
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 10:52 pm

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by Kealia »

^What they said^

Let us know if you had a reason for wanting to rack the beer to a secondary or if this is just what you think you should do from reading.
User avatar
ebbz
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:56 am
Location: The Great White Mid-Atlantic

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by ebbz »

My main reason was to clarify the.batch and separate it from the trub . I have read much and and thought it might make for a clearer batch. I was thinking about this for a batch of hard cider. I have not racked to a secondary for my beer and with the exception of some sediment I have not had a problem. I have always joked that the sediment is just extra "flavor." I will always listen to those that are more experienced than me and appreciate the comments.
LLAP

-In Cervesia Veritas
User avatar
mashani
mashani
mashani
Posts: 6743
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:57 pm

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by mashani »

If you leave it in the bottle for 4 weeks or so, and then put it in the fridge a while before you open it, and are careful to just pour the beer all at once into a pint glass in a single pour with just a little bit left behind, any extra sediment should pretty much just stay in the bottle.

And clarity is over rated. Look at east coast beers these days LOL.

If it really bothers you then buy a yeast that says it's "highly flocculent". A good clean yeast that is fermented anywhere from 57-66 degrees is Nottingham. You will get clear beer or cider from that yeast secondary or not because the sediment in the fermenter will pack down into a gelatinous mass by 2 weeks.
User avatar
MrBandGuy
Fully Fermented
Fully Fermented
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 6:36 pm
Location: Southern Indiana

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by MrBandGuy »

Also, beers clear with time. I also have rarely used a secondary. Especially with the cider, a couple weeks in the fridge should drop out any remaining yeast.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
User avatar
ebbz
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:56 am
Location: The Great White Mid-Atlantic

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by ebbz »

Thanks again. I guess I will just keep on doing what has traditionally worked best for me and ignore the hype.
LLAP

-In Cervesia Veritas
User avatar
berryman
Brew Guru
Brew Guru
Posts: 3279
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 5:16 pm
Location: Western NY

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by berryman »

ebbz, all the advice above is right on and I have not ever done a secondary on a small batch of low gravity beer. But with that said, I secondary most every 5 gal and larger brews and I have reasons for doing it.
1} I binge brew, I have one 6.5 primary and three 5 gal carboys. I can get my turn around time from 1 -2 weeks per batch in the primary. I can get a lot of beer going in a few months time.
2} I can let the beer sit in the secondary for quite a while when I am too busy to bottle and that gives it some good conditioning time also
3} it does make a clearer beer but with loss.
4} A secondary works good for dry hopping or adding fruit or some late spices.
On to the bad things and disadvantages.
1} Doubled the chances of contamination.
2} Risk of oxidation. and yes not much head space needed or wanted in a secondary.
3} More work involved in the brewing process......
So what I'm saying is, it's not a bad thing to do, but usually not needed most of the time, but depends on your circumstances.
Happy Hound Brewery

“I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work.”
― Thomas A. Edison
User avatar
mashani
mashani
mashani
Posts: 6743
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:57 pm

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by mashani »

I binge brew, I have one 6.5 primary and three 5 gal carboys. I can get my turn around time from 1 -2 weeks per batch in the primary. I can get a lot of beer going in a few months time.
This is pretty much the only reason I would still do it, except I solve that problem by just having more primary fermenters.
User avatar
ebbz
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:56 am
Location: The Great White Mid-Atlantic

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by ebbz »

berryman wrote:ebbz, all the advice above is right on and I have not ever done a secondary on a small batch of low gravity beer. But with that said, I secondary most every 5 gal and larger brews and I have reasons for doing it.
1} I binge brew, I have one 6.5 primary and three 5 gal carboys. I can get my turn around time from 1 -2 weeks per batch in the primary. I can get a lot of beer going in a few months time.
2} I can let the beer sit in the secondary for quite a while when I am too busy to bottle and that gives it some good conditioning time also
3} it does make a clearer beer but with loss.
4} A secondary works good for dry hopping or adding fruit or some late spices.
On to the bad things and disadvantages.
1} Doubled the chances of contamination.
2} Risk of oxidation. and yes not much head space needed or wanted in a secondary.
3} More work involved in the brewing process......
So what I'm saying is, it's not a bad thing to do, but usually not needed most of the time, but depends on your circumstances.
At what OG should one consider it is high gravity? If extra fermentables are added (sugar, honey, etc), should that be extra "yeast food" be taken as high gravity?
LLAP

-In Cervesia Veritas
User avatar
RickBeer
Brew Guru
Brew Guru
Posts: 3099
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:21 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan (Go Blue!)

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by RickBeer »

OG above 1.075.
I have over 9,000 posts on "another forum", which means absolutely nothing. Mr. Beer January 2014 Brewer of the Month with all the pomp and circumstance that comes with it...

Certificate in Brewing and Distillation Technology

Sites to find beer making supplies: Adventures in Homebrewing - Mr. Beer - MoreBeer
My Beer - click to reveal
Currently using 6 LBKs.

Beers I regularly brew:
Bell's Best Brown clone
Irish Hills Red - I call this "Ann Arbor Red"
Mackinac Island Red - I call this "Michigan Red"
Oatmeal Stout - I call this Not Fat, Stout - Oatmeal Stout

Bottled 5 gallons of Ann Arbor Red on 4/18/17. Bottled 5 gallons of Michigan Red on 5/8/17.

Brewed in 2017 - 22.13 gallons (19.91 in 2012, 48.06 in 2013, 61.39 in 2014, 84.26 in 2015,46.39 in 2016)
Brewed in lifetime - 282.14 gallons
Drinkable beer on hand -  13.58 cases, with 6.11 cases ready in May and early June.
Average cost per 12 pack through all beer brewed - $6.27(ingredients only)
User avatar
mashani
mashani
mashani
Posts: 6743
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:57 pm

Re: Secondary Fermemtation

Post by mashani »

I would call that high gravity too, however I have brewed beers that big (and bigger, all the way up to close to 1.09 this year), without bothering with a secondary or even longer (3-4 week) waits in my primary fermenter.

Just use this pitch rate calculator:

http://www.brewersfriend.com/yeast-pitc ... alculator/

And for beers in the 1.07-1.08 range pick "Pro Brewer 1.0", and pick "Pro Brewer 1.25" if it's higher then that. And yeah it will tell you to pitch a hella lot of yeast, way more then Mr. Malty. Do it. Your fermentation will be done in 7-10 days even with a beer that big. That's pretty much how all those worked out, I bottled them at day 14 and they would have been completely drinkable then if I could have force carbed them. The big Belgian and spiced winter beers I made this year I could have consumed immediately out of the fermenter since I started pitching at those rates. Secondary totally not necessary for conditioning.

In the relatively recent past (a few years back) I would still have not secondary them, but they would have stayed in my primary for 3 weeks, and then sat in the bottle for 3 months.

But totally not required since I said "what the hell" and actually tried pitching at those stupidly high seeming rates. Those rates allow for about 2-3 generations of growth in the fermenter, which is all that is needed to generate the ester/phenol profile for most things (maybe not banana forward wheat beers or very fruity Belgians unless you ferment hot), or to avoid unwanted ones if using a clean yeast.
Post Reply