Page 2 of 2

Re: Opinions?

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:33 am
by RickBeer
Newcastle DID have food coloring, removed over a year ago. http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/201 ... /22371053/

Re: Opinions?

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:04 am
by Dawg LB Steve
I think I kinda remember having this same conversation here about a year ago, about the same article or from the same author.
:cheers:

Re: Opinions?

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:44 am
by Gymrat
Dawg LB Steve wrote:I think I kinda remember having this same conversation here about a year ago, about the same article or from the same author.
:cheers:
Well then...that gives us all a year to come up with new comments for this topic next year about this time.

Re: Opinions?

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:16 am
by John Sand
:lol:

Re: Opinions?

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 11:35 am
by Dawg LB Steve
Sounds good

Sent from my XT830C using Tapatalk

Re: Opinions?

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:31 pm
by jimjohson
FedoraDave wrote:Do you realize that just about everything we eat is genetically modified? It's called hybridization, and it's been going on since Biblical times, if not earlier. You wouldn't want to eat the "original" versions of corn or apples. Just because it's done quicker, and in a laboratory, doesn't mean it's "bad" or "evil." It's just streamlined, the same way we don't use rotary phones anymore, because speed dial is more convenient.

Like dogs. My wife's Shih Tzu(or my Pekingese) is a long way from something that could actually survive in the wild(I do think a pack of Jack Russell's would do well). Like the man said, we've been doing it for a very long time...To everything IMHO they're not leaving as much to chance as some people think. We've been doing this or so long we already know what to expect from the plants. Could this be perverted? (shrugs) Sure, but so can Lasik surgery. Don't see that stopping anyone.

Re: Opinions?

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 10:12 pm
by FedoraDave
jimjohson wrote: Could this be perverted? (shrugs) Sure, but so can Lasik surgery. Don't see that stopping anyone.
Yeah, I had my kidney stone treated with a non-invasive technique. Worked great. Much better than when my dad had surgery for his kidney stones back in the 70s. He had a scar that looked like the surgeon climbed inside to get the stone out.

It's called progress, folks.

Re: Opinions?

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 10:55 pm
by bpgreen
FedoraDave wrote:
jimjohson wrote: Could this be perverted? (shrugs) Sure, but so can Lasik surgery. Don't see that stopping anyone.
Yeah, I had my kidney stone treated with a non-invasive technique. Worked great. Much better than when my dad had surgery for his kidney stones back in the 70s. He had a scar that looked like the surgeon climbed inside to get the stone out.

It's called progress, folks.
It could be worse. I knew somebody whose doctor showed him this long tool and said they could get the kidney stone out using that. He was ready to go that route until he asked the doctor where the incision would be. The doctor told him there was no need to make an incision because there was already a way in.

Re: Opinions?

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 4:16 pm
by Whamolagan
bpgreen wrote:
FedoraDave wrote:
jimjohson wrote: Could this be perverted? (shrugs) Sure, but so can Lasik surgery. Don't see that stopping anyone.
Yeah, I had my kidney stone treated with a non-invasive technique. Worked great. Much better than when my dad had surgery for his kidney stones back in the 70s. He had a scar that looked like the surgeon climbed inside to get the stone out.

It's called progress, folks.
It could be worse. I knew somebody whose doctor showed him this long tool and said they could get the kidney stone out using that. He was ready to go that route until he asked the doctor where the incision would be. The doctor told him there was no need to make an incision because there was already a way in.
UHH yeah no