Re: Opinions?
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:33 am
Newcastle DID have food coloring, removed over a year ago. http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/201 ... /22371053/
Well then...that gives us all a year to come up with new comments for this topic next year about this time.Dawg LB Steve wrote:I think I kinda remember having this same conversation here about a year ago, about the same article or from the same author.
FedoraDave wrote:Do you realize that just about everything we eat is genetically modified? It's called hybridization, and it's been going on since Biblical times, if not earlier. You wouldn't want to eat the "original" versions of corn or apples. Just because it's done quicker, and in a laboratory, doesn't mean it's "bad" or "evil." It's just streamlined, the same way we don't use rotary phones anymore, because speed dial is more convenient.
Yeah, I had my kidney stone treated with a non-invasive technique. Worked great. Much better than when my dad had surgery for his kidney stones back in the 70s. He had a scar that looked like the surgeon climbed inside to get the stone out.jimjohson wrote: Could this be perverted? (shrugs) Sure, but so can Lasik surgery. Don't see that stopping anyone.
It could be worse. I knew somebody whose doctor showed him this long tool and said they could get the kidney stone out using that. He was ready to go that route until he asked the doctor where the incision would be. The doctor told him there was no need to make an incision because there was already a way in.FedoraDave wrote:Yeah, I had my kidney stone treated with a non-invasive technique. Worked great. Much better than when my dad had surgery for his kidney stones back in the 70s. He had a scar that looked like the surgeon climbed inside to get the stone out.jimjohson wrote: Could this be perverted? (shrugs) Sure, but so can Lasik surgery. Don't see that stopping anyone.
It's called progress, folks.
UHH yeah nobpgreen wrote:It could be worse. I knew somebody whose doctor showed him this long tool and said they could get the kidney stone out using that. He was ready to go that route until he asked the doctor where the incision would be. The doctor told him there was no need to make an incision because there was already a way in.FedoraDave wrote:Yeah, I had my kidney stone treated with a non-invasive technique. Worked great. Much better than when my dad had surgery for his kidney stones back in the 70s. He had a scar that looked like the surgeon climbed inside to get the stone out.jimjohson wrote: Could this be perverted? (shrugs) Sure, but so can Lasik surgery. Don't see that stopping anyone.
It's called progress, folks.