I think I figured it out, and I feel kind of stupid now
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 9:10 am
This past summer, I bought a new mash tun. I felt it was time to upgrade from the 5-gallon DIY tun (which I still have, and might possibly put back into use) to a 10-g one that kept sitting there at the LHBS, tempting me and taunting me silently. I have a couple of recipes that really stretched the volume limits of the 5-g, and at least one that simply was too much for it.
But here's the thing: I had dialed in my post-mash volume perfectly with my old tun. I knew I was going to get back exactly 50% of my strike water in the first runnings, so planning my sparges and being confident with my pre-boil volume was guaranteed. But I just haven't been able to nail down these volumes with the 10-g, and I couldn't figure out why. Until today.
See, the primary difference between these two tuns (besides capacity) is that the DIY 5-g had a manifold I made with C-PVC pipes. The pre-made 10-g tun has a false bottom. This means that whatever the volume of water is below that false bottom, it never comes into contact with the grains, and therefore my absorption is going to be different. So I figure if I measure the amount of water up to the false bottom, I should be able to calculate that in and figure the difference into my first-runnings projections.
Does anyone see any flaws in this? I'm pretty much math-impaired, so don't get too formulaic or technical; just use plain English and equations that a 4th Grader could understand (and that comparison is an insult to the 4th Grader, believe me).
But here's the thing: I had dialed in my post-mash volume perfectly with my old tun. I knew I was going to get back exactly 50% of my strike water in the first runnings, so planning my sparges and being confident with my pre-boil volume was guaranteed. But I just haven't been able to nail down these volumes with the 10-g, and I couldn't figure out why. Until today.
See, the primary difference between these two tuns (besides capacity) is that the DIY 5-g had a manifold I made with C-PVC pipes. The pre-made 10-g tun has a false bottom. This means that whatever the volume of water is below that false bottom, it never comes into contact with the grains, and therefore my absorption is going to be different. So I figure if I measure the amount of water up to the false bottom, I should be able to calculate that in and figure the difference into my first-runnings projections.
Does anyone see any flaws in this? I'm pretty much math-impaired, so don't get too formulaic or technical; just use plain English and equations that a 4th Grader could understand (and that comparison is an insult to the 4th Grader, believe me).