Re: The No Post Post
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 1:24 pm
Yes you overreacted.
So, I just want to make sure I understand your stance. Lets change the objects and pricing a bit.SomeGuyBrewing wrote:Yes you overreacted.
No, I wouldn't pay that. Fortunately for us we live in a time and era where there are so many options available when we decide to purchase an item. In your TV scenario, I'd go to a different store or look online or get a rain check. The consumer is not entitled to a lower price. I've worked in retail too and sorry to burst your bubble but the customer is NOT always right. Different companies have different policies. And in my experience the bigger and more well know the company the stricter the policies. I've worked at a place where I can cut you any kind of deal I wanted if I thought it was good for business, hell I could give it to you for free and my bosses would have trusted that I read you as a customer that's going to pay off in the long run. On the flip side of that I've also worked at a company where if I gave you a .50 cent discount and my receipts didn't match stock it would come out of my pay to cover the "lose". Now I don't know Omaha Steak's policies about this, but lets say that's the case, why should this woman (with no investment in the company, it's just a job) have to pay for your steaks. My point is take issue with the company, not some hourly worker just trying to earn a paycheck.So, I just want to make sure I understand your stance. Lets change the objects and pricing a bit.
Say you go in for a a 50" Sony TV that is on sale for $900.00 and they are all out. But don't worry, they have a 40" Sony TV (Same thing just smaller) for $1000.00, you would have no issue paying that extra $100.00 for something smaller?
Actually it doesn't suck as bad as it could. You have the option to pay the $2.29 or drive down the road and pay $2.05, you could live in a world without competition and every station is just $2.29sucks to be a consumer!
SomeGuyBrewing wrote:No, I wouldn't pay that. Fortunately for us we live in a time and era where there are so many options available when we decide to purchase an item. In your TV scenario, I'd go to a different store or look online or get a rain check. The consumer is not entitled to a lower price. I've worked in retail too and sorry to burst your bubble but the customer is NOT always right. Different companies have different policies. And in my experience the bigger and more well know the company the stricter the policies. I've worked at a place where I can cut you any kind of deal I wanted if I thought it was good for business, hell I could give it to you for free and my bosses would have trusted that I read you as a customer that's going to pay off in the long run. On the flip side of that I've also worked at a company where if I gave you a .50 cent discount and my receipts didn't match stock it would come out of my pay to cover the "lose". Now I don't know Omaha Steak's policies about this, but lets say that's the case, why should this woman (with no investment in the company, it's just a job) have to pay for your steaks. My point is take issue with the company, not some hourly worker just trying to earn a paycheck.So, I just want to make sure I understand your stance. Lets change the objects and pricing a bit.
Say you go in for a a 50" Sony TV that is on sale for $900.00 and they are all out. But don't worry, they have a 40" Sony TV (Same thing just smaller) for $1000.00, you would have no issue paying that extra $100.00 for something smaller?
Actually it doesn't suck as bad as it could. You have the option to pay the $2.29 or drive down the road and pay $2.05, you could live in a world without competition and every station is just $2.29sucks to be a consumer!
Context is everything
Context and perspective, man they can change anything. I think your thought process is right, yeah the company SHOULD want to keep the customer happy and coming back, I just don't think you should take frustration out on some lady running the cash register. If it was me, I would have asked the girl if I could talk to someone in charge/higher up. I like to fight for the little guy. I've had customers get upset with me over something out of my control (company policy), and its not laziness, its trying to keep your job. One job of mine specifically stated that discounts and freebies not specifically approved by a manager could be considered stealing from the company and the employee could be subject to disciplinary action.they are just being lazy
BlackDuck wrote:It's 7 degrees outside right now. Damn, that's cold. I need to move south.
Yeah. We can go for weeks at a time without seeing the top-side of 7 degrees. In fact we haven't seen the top side of zero all day today.FrozenInTime wrote:7 degrees, 25, 19, 22... y'all r funny! What a hoot to hear guys complain about those nice, warm and toasty temps!
Chuck N wrote:Yeah. We can go for weeks at a time without seeing the top-side of 7 degrees. In fact we haven't seen the top side of zero all day today.FrozenInTime wrote:7 degrees, 25, 19, 22... y'all r funny! What a hoot to hear guys complain about those nice, warm and toasty temps!